Bikes running great, no real complaints on the handling (best bike i've ever owned) but in checking my sag numbers may need springs so could be even better? have already changed fork oil to 5wt and have 120 mm oil level (was a great improvement) Fork sag, static=40mm rider=60mm Shock sag, static=29mm rider=108mm confident in my numbers and tested with full tank gas, warmed suspension and full riding gear on. bike is not raced but trail ridden hard and fast, I weight 168lbs without gear. Confusion with "Race Tech" spring selection. fork needs a .441 kg spring (stock is .45kg) rear needs a 5.76kg (stock 5.2) I felt my front spring was the only concern with only 60mm sag. Any thoughts?? how much softer fork spring will get me a 70 mm rider sag? Thanks, Lorenzo M. 2011 te310 at 78h
Thanks Freestyle Something else for me to think about..But I was going to try a "Race tech" .42 fork spring and maybe up the rear to 5.4 as I seem to have the spring fairly compressed and loose most of my static if I try to get closer to 100mm rider sag (a bit soft as you suggest) The Husky 5.2 is progressive? did not realise that. On the forks, have only bottomed them once or twice even with the 120mm oil height and really my only issue is fork deflection in the rocky stuff. Do you think .42 with higher oil level would reduce the chances of blowing through the stroke? L. (lovin the x-light)
