• Husqvarna Motorcycles Made In Sweden - About 1988 and older

  • Hi everyone,

    As you all know, Coffee (Dean) passed away a couple of years ago. I am Dean's ex-wife's husband and happen to have spent my career in tech. Over the years, I occasionally helped Dean with various tech issues.

    When he passed, I worked with his kids to gather the necessary credentials to keep this site running. Since then (and for however long they worked with Coffee), Woodschick and Dirtdame have been maintaining the site and covering the costs. Without their hard work and financial support, CafeHusky would have been lost.

    Over the past couple of weeks, I’ve been working to migrate the site to a free cloud compute instance so that Woodschick and Dirtdame no longer have to fund it. At the same time, I’ve updated the site to a current version of XenForo (the discussion software it runs on). The previous version was outdated and no longer supported.

    Unfortunately, the new software version doesn’t support importing the old site’s styles, so for now, you’ll see the XenForo default style. This may change over time.

    Coffee didn’t document the work he did on the site, so I’ve been digging through the old setup to understand how everything was running. There may still be things I’ve missed. One known issue is that email functionality is not yet working on the new site, but I hope to resolve this over time.

    Thanks for your patience and support!

A Couple Questions

Chaz955i

Husqvarna
A Class
Hey All,

I have an 82 125xc. I bought it used and it has an 18 inch rear wheel. No complaints but I thought the 82 models came with 17 inch wheels. Was 18 an option or did someone possibly change it out later?

Secondly, I've been checking out ebay for a possible addition and noticed a lot of the bikes in the 81-83 range have the top of the forks sticking out way above the top clamp. Did some have longer tubes to accommodate this? I have about 10mm above the clamp on my bike. I assume raising the forks would make the bike steer a bit quicker but i'm wary of what would happen if I bottom the forks and there isn't enough clearance.

Thanks,
Chuck
 
I don't know about the wheel size. I know my 83 xc 500 needed those forks pretty close to flush or the wheel would hit the fender. The stuff on ebay may well have had a few owners since the last one that actually put tanks of gas through it. Remove the fork caps so the springs can come out/up and see. The wr models generally have less travel. I am not sure the fork differences for what you have.
 
I don't know about the wheel size. I know my 83 xc 500 needed those forks pretty close to flush or the wheel would hit the fender. The stuff on ebay may well have had a few owners since the last one that actually put tanks of gas through it. Remove the fork caps so the springs can come out/up and see. The wr models generally have less travel. I am not sure the fork differences for what you have.
Yeah, it seemed strange to have a couple inches of fork sticking out above the clamp but as I've seen it a few times already I thought there might be something I'm not aware of. I've only gotten into the vintage Huskys in the past year so there is way more I don't know than I do know. Thanks.
 
79 & 80 Huskys had long travel 35mm's forks that stuck out the top 2-1/4" stock. They went away from that with the 40mm"s in 81 I think.
I believe all the bikes got 18" rear wheels in 83, not sure. My 83 XC had an 18".
 
Copie de 125 wr 1982 fev 2011 no1.JPG

y have a rear 18 in my 125 WR 1982 !
rubber good for me !
(in Europe only rubber
FIM for the race ! )
MICHELIN FIM (the best)
METZELLER SIX DAYS FIM !(good)
 
SAM_3690.JPG

spark arester this !
( but in europe no
obligation to race
or off-road légal! )
picture one
is a silencer
HONDA 500 CR !
:thumbsup:
 
Back
Top