• Husqvarna Motorcycles Made In Sweden - About 1988 and older

  • Hi everyone,

    As you all know, Coffee (Dean) passed away a couple of years ago. I am Dean's ex-wife's husband and happen to have spent my career in tech. Over the years, I occasionally helped Dean with various tech issues.

    When he passed, I worked with his kids to gather the necessary credentials to keep this site running. Since then (and for however long they worked with Coffee), Woodschick and Dirtdame have been maintaining the site and covering the costs. Without their hard work and financial support, CafeHusky would have been lost.

    Over the past couple of weeks, I’ve been working to migrate the site to a free cloud compute instance so that Woodschick and Dirtdame no longer have to fund it. At the same time, I’ve updated the site to a current version of XenForo (the discussion software it runs on). The previous version was outdated and no longer supported.

    Unfortunately, the new software version doesn’t support importing the old site’s styles, so for now, you’ll see the XenForo default style. This may change over time.

    Coffee didn’t document the work he did on the site, so I’ve been digging through the old setup to understand how everything was running. There may still be things I’ve missed. One known issue is that email functionality is not yet working on the new site, but I hope to resolve this over time.

    Thanks for your patience and support!

Fork suggestions

Husq.fleet

Husq.fleet

Husqvarna
AA Class
Getting ready to set up a couple of my bikes for next seasons riding. I,m looking for some suggestions on front forks, set up. I'm sure this has been discussed before so forgive me-I'm new. 1st. my riding style, non-aggressive 250lbs, bike rarely gets more than foot or so off of ground. 2nd. Bike is a 82 XC430. I'm parting out my dead 87-430XC and was wondering if those forks would be a upgrade over the 82's? they look like a bolt on changeover. They always seemed to work good for my riding style. My other bike 83-500XC will be a little more aggressive, plan on doing some vintage racing with it if back will hold up. If the 87 forks are better for more aggressive riding I'll put them on the 500. I'll ask about my 82, CR250 and 84-WR500 later! Thanks Scott.
 
If you plan to use the 500XC in Vintage competition make sure your organization's rules allow that (1987) fork swap. You don't want to waste a lot of effort and money to find out the bike will not pass tech.
 
87 fork is a bolt over but as said the disc will kill any vintage comp elegibilty. I do bellieve the 81-84 front whell fits with drum as the spacer in the pinch is adjustable. And the speedo drive (or spacer) is same for all those years. Other option is

tn_gold_valve.jpg


GOLD VALVE Emulators make damping rod forks perform like well-tuned cartridge forks. Emulators are tunable valves that sit on top of the damping rods and are held in place with the main springs. This makes them both simple to install and completely tunable for all conditions and rider preferences. SPRING ARE Chrome silicon, high stiffness to mass ratio, shot peened, heat treated and pre-set (no sacking). These are the finest springs available. Several rates to chose from too.COMPLETE STEP BY STEP INSTRUCTIONS INCLUDED

Someone here tried them and says they are the bomb on their 500 if I recall.

Joe
 
I have DLS front brakes on both bikes, 82-430 and 83-500. If the 87 forks were better I was "hoping" to put them in the earlier lower legs? I would like to use the disc brake off of the 87 someday to build a restified 82-WR250. I found in my stuff another set of forks, disc brake mounts on lower leg but are the shorter ones for a WR which will work good for my future build. The Race Tech set up looks very nice but I was wondering if it might be a little overkill for my riding style but do like the adjustability. Thanks for the help. I'm very happy to find this site and the very helpfull people who share common interests. Scott
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top