Bike weights - 2000 Husky WR250 vs 2003 Honda CR250R

Discussion in 'General (Main)' started by letitsnow, May 6, 2011.

  1. pvduke Husqvarna
    Pro Class

    Location:
    ... on the gas...
    Husqvarna Motorcycle:
    tripple-hondo hoosk...
    Other Motorcycles:
    dozens of them, kicked to the curb
    sounds light to me. my '03 CR205R weighed 230'ish with PC sparky muff, UFO pro-guard barkies, IMS 3.2 gal tank half or so full, MS bashy, rad guards, HD tubes, 11oz FWW, 15' of paracord on the X-bar etc etc. it was 220'ish dry if i recall and claimed was 212#!

    honda lied, like the rest sans KTM, about 10# till about 2009 i think...then they got "ready to ride" weights and those were pretty on target.
    WR's are robust, steel frame enduro ready for the most part. get a lot more for your money and spend less generally as well. my CR off-roaders (more than one...) ate stuff like plating coming off cylinders before a ring wore out (yes jetting was correct), wheel brgs, hubs, rims, fork seals, c/s seals, shock seals, frames, etc...those allum perimeter frames sucked balls. hubs and bearings were garbage too. the 03 motor was way better than the 04 off road. they were close but i really liked the 03. that 03 was a killer gnarly bike. 04 was ok, but, the 03 was great.
  2. letitsnow Husqvarna
    AA Class

    Location:
    mn
    Husqvarna Motorcycle:
    FC250
    Other Motorcycles:
    CBR600F4
    I'm not really worried about my scale being accurate because it was a comparison - both bikes were weighed on the same scale...
  3. motomaniac Husqvarna
    A Class

    Location:
    Kamloops BC Canada
    Husqvarna Motorcycle:
    2010 WR300
    Other Motorcycles:
    2009 RMZ450 2005YZ250 2001 EXC300
    I don't worry about one bike being a few pounds heavier than another. I think what is more important is power to weight ratio and center of gravity. Power to weight ratio is pretty self explanitory. When the center of gravitiy is lower on a bike, it will feel lighter and hook up better than an equal weight bike with a higher one. That what makes 4 stokes (camshafts and valves) feel so heavy and makes them harder to turn. Add a starter and battery, and its even worse. I just got back on a 2 stroke after 2 years on a 450, and I'm already way faster with results to prove it. Can wait to get used to the bike.
  4. pvduke Husqvarna
    Pro Class

    Location:
    ... on the gas...
    Husqvarna Motorcycle:
    tripple-hondo hoosk...
    Other Motorcycles:
    dozens of them, kicked to the curb
    maybe the scale i was using was off. if its really 217, i might have to go get me another one! i do get pretty weight-weenie when it comes to pedal bikes. ill fish-scale every part during my build lookin' for the lightest ones etc...yeh, i know, not healthy and obsessive...lol.

    motoman hit it on the head too with the moving parts thingy...
  5. letitsnow Husqvarna
    AA Class

    Location:
    mn
    Husqvarna Motorcycle:
    FC250
    Other Motorcycles:
    CBR600F4
    My '93 CR125 weighs 220 (ready to ride) on the same scale. Not that it matters much, but it is fun to compare stuff!

    I suspect that I would have been just as fast (as I am on the Honda CR250) on the Husky WR if I had put the CR ignition on it. Riding style matching a motor that spools up/down faster was probably a bigger factor than the weight difference...
  6. pvduke Husqvarna
    Pro Class

    Location:
    ... on the gas...
    Husqvarna Motorcycle:
    tripple-hondo hoosk...
    Other Motorcycles:
    dozens of them, kicked to the curb
    egzacarhy! weights are subjective to a lot of factors. you make an excellent, valid point!!!