Excellent results from testing settings on the EFI settings...

Discussion in 'EFI/carb' started by Motosportz, Dec 22, 2009.

Page 2 of 2

  1. fitness2go Husqvarna
    AA Class

    Location:
    Seattle WA
    How much more do you love it compared to the 1 2 5?
    fitness2go, Dec 31, 2009
    #21

  2. Motosportz CH Sponsor

    Location:
    Vancouver WA
    Husqvarna Motorcycle:
    2021 TE250i, 570 Berg, 500 KTM, 790R
    Other Motorcycles:
    many
    the 125 is a freaking fun bike. The TXC is very similar in the fun factor and a little EZer to ride as the motor is more forgiving. Hard to say which one I like better. The 125 is super simple and VERY light, had a blast on it this summer. The TXC is more complicated and not as light but has a better motor. I could waffle all day on the virtues of each but this is a EFI post. :D

    On several recent rides we had Jakes 08 TXC250 (300), my 2010 TXC and Shanes 09 WR125 (that does not run as good as mine but is getting close) and all had virtues. Shanes bike was actually maybe the most fun that day, super light bikes work well in snow and slop. I was fastest on my TXC, the 125 was fun and EZ to ride and Jakes 300 was an EZ and forgiving trail machine.
    Motosportz, Dec 31, 2009
    #22

  3. Darkside Husqvarna
    AA Class

    Location:
    SF Bay Area
    Husqvarna Motorcycle:
    none left
    Other Motorcycles:
    beta, ktm, aprilia
    I tried to go leaner at the 1st stage. I went to 98.5 on CO1. with the SA in. It went too lean. It had a hesitation off idle. I went back to 100.5 on CO1 and CO2-104, CO3-105.
    Darkside, Jan 10, 2010
    #23

  4. DougW Husqvarna
    AA Class

    Location:
    Santa Clarita, CA
    any idea what the stock mapping numbers are for both the sensor connected and not, ie: map 1 and map 2? are they both 100,100,100? if so what makes map 2 richer that you needed to go leaner on the low end? is this more of function of the timing?
    DougW, Jan 10, 2010
    #24
Page 2 of 2