1. 2 Stroke Husqvarna Motorcycles Made In Italy - About 1989 to 2014
    WR = 2st Enduro & CR = 2st Cross

250-500cc KYB SSS Forks

Discussion in '2 Stroke' started by Motovet45, Jul 20, 2014.

  1. GMP Husqvarna
    AA Class

    Location:
    NJ
    Husqvarna Motorcycle:
    none
    Other Motorcycles:
    '13 Beta 300RR Racing
    The Braking POW106 is for the '08+ fork. For '06 SSS fork with the older lug you would use the POW13. These are both for Nissin calipers and 260mm rotors. I have not tried to fit a Brembo caliper. Nissin brakes from blown up YZFs are all over ebay just like the forks.

    As far as the length, my Zokes are 940mm and I run them 10mm up in the clamps. So, these will just be run 5mm (one line) lower for the same geometry and still have another 5mm option. The longer fork will work fine too, but that means more above the clamp and I don't like my bars any higher than neccessary. Maybe on a Husky it won't matter but on a Beta it means raise the bars. The reason the Yamaha KYB forks are different is that the 125 and 250F have a shorter steering head tube/stem, thats it, nothing else to it.
  2. Motovet45 Husqvarna
    AA Class

    Location:
    California City, Ca
    Husqvarna Motorcycle:
    WR 300
    The track I initially rode them on was a vet track, at the other tracks I ride they did not do as we'll. I've noticed some of your posts on Thumper Talk regarding the Restackor program for valve stacks, have you found that this program works pretty good? I'm sure the valving could be a lot better but I'm a noob when it comes to changing the stacks and am really only going off the stacks on the sheets Race Tech sends out with their valves. They give several combinations but if you don't know which way to go it can be a handful.
  3. Motovet45 Husqvarna
    AA Class

    Location:
    California City, Ca
    Husqvarna Motorcycle:
    WR 300
    Thanks for the info, I guess I will check everything out once I get my hands on the forks. Right now I'm just guessing.
  4. Kyle Tarry Husqvarna
    Pro Class

    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Husqvarna Motorcycle:
    2012 WR 300, 2006 TE 610
    Other Motorcycles:
    Ducati Monster S2R 800
    ReStackor works well for certain things, but it's not intuitive. I don't think it makes sense for your average tinkerer to buy a copy just to do one set of forks, the learning curve is too steep.

    I do not want to dissuade you from swapping to SSS forks, because they are very good. However, there is no reason that your stock forks should be that bad. They used the same forks on a bunch of very good, very successful MX bikes for quite a few years in the early 2000's.

    If you want to try to improve your forks, you could start a thread about it and there are quite a few people here who could probably chime in. This is a classic case of why I don't always suggest RaceTech stuff; you're not necessarily any better off now than you were with the stock stuff.
  5. GMP Husqvarna
    AA Class

    Location:
    NJ
    Husqvarna Motorcycle:
    none
    Other Motorcycles:
    '13 Beta 300RR Racing
    You really have to be able to get a very good baseline feel of a fork setup and then analyze it with Restackor, then it is expressed in numbers and can be delt with. Its not a replacement for good evaluation experience.

    I agree with Kyle, no need for the Gold Valves on this fork or most others for that matter. Sure they can work but its a completely different piston and will need completely different stacks. The only reason to scrap stock pistons is if there is a flow problem but in this fork (and most) that is not the case. You could actually prove this to yourself with Restackor.

    The SSS fork retains that plush initial feel because the cartridge pressure starts off essentially at 0, like an OC fork. The valving specs are relatively stiff to deal with the unstable oil at this point even for woods setups. The Marzocchi 48 PFP concept is the opposite. Much higher initial pressure even at minimun PFP and much lighter valving, with a comp piston you could breathe through! Different approaches that both work.
    Motosportz likes this.
  6. rabskyline Husqvarna
    AA Class

    Location:
    Sunshine Coast,Queenslander !!
    Husqvarna Motorcycle:
    2014 te250r
    Other Motorcycles:
    Yer maw !
    If it's a good comparison, I had an 07 te510, 2010 te250 and now 14 te250r(SSS), the new bike would shit all over the zokes on the 510, even if they had no oil in them.
    I have nothing good to say about the shivers, absolute garbage forks.
  7. Kyle Tarry Husqvarna
    Pro Class

    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Husqvarna Motorcycle:
    2012 WR 300, 2006 TE 610
    Other Motorcycles:
    Ducati Monster S2R 800
    The Shiver 45s on my TE610 are some of the best woods forks I have ever ridden. They have some revalving and some tweaks, but nothing magical.

    It's all about setup and personal preference.
  8. rabskyline Husqvarna
    AA Class

    Location:
    Sunshine Coast,Queenslander !!
    Husqvarna Motorcycle:
    2014 te250r
    Other Motorcycles:
    Yer maw !
    Must have so me decent work and a good tuner to get them decent.
    KYB are far superior stock.
  9. GMP Husqvarna
    AA Class

    Location:
    NJ
    Husqvarna Motorcycle:
    none
    Other Motorcycles:
    '13 Beta 300RR Racing
    Zoke 45 Shivers have a high rate of anodizing failure, especially the GG versions due to the thinner upper tube wall to fit their clamps originally designed for the prior WP43s. I had my GG with them working well but only in a limited scope of terrain and speed. After some time on a modern CC fork they are not even worth discussing. I just did a set of 2001 46mm OC KYBs on my son's KX and first try they were better than my Shivers ever were.
    rabskyline likes this.
  10. roj00 Husqvarna
    AA Class

    Location:
    New Zealand
    Husqvarna Motorcycle:
    2010 wr250
    Other Motorcycles:
    Xr250, drz400 sm
    Does anybody know if the re stackor program works for open chamber forks?