As you all know, Coffee (Dean) passed away a couple of years ago. I am Dean's ex-wife's husband and happen to have spent my career in tech. Over the years, I occasionally helped Dean with various tech issues.
When he passed, I worked with his kids to gather the necessary credentials to keep this site running. Since then (and for however long they worked with Coffee), Woodschick and Dirtdame have been maintaining the site and covering the costs. Without their hard work and financial support, CafeHusky would have been lost.
Over the past couple of weeks, I’ve been working to migrate the site to a free cloud compute instance so that Woodschick and Dirtdame no longer have to fund it. At the same time, I’ve updated the site to a current version of XenForo (the discussion software it runs on). The previous version was outdated and no longer supported.
Unfortunately, the new software version doesn’t support importing the old site’s styles, so for now, you’ll see the XenForo default style. This may change over time.
Coffee didn’t document the work he did on the site, so I’ve been digging through the old setup to understand how everything was running. There may still be things I’ve missed. One known issue is that email functionality is not yet working on the new site, but I hope to resolve this over time.
Thanks for your patience and support!
Also I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that the 240 was a de-stroked 250 as according to the parts guy Ray at Halls the 240 and 250's share the same bore diameter, 66.44. This piston is the first over size I do believe.
the skirt does more than stabilize piston, if you install the jug and piston and turn engine over looking thru the reed area...you will notice that you never see over the top of the piston. the fuel/air charge is drawn below the piston to the crank case, then thru the boost ports to the combustion chamber. if the skirt is any longer on the intake side, it will affect performance. the piston you bought is an unusual listing from wossner..
a 240 would be identical except for bore..same everything, well except the airbox decal.Oh I don't doubt you guys but now that the cylinder is at the machine shop I'm kinda in a panic situation, potentially making one big paper weight.
If the stroke between the 240 and 250 is the same what would make the pistons be so drastically different? I'm having a hard time finding a picture of a 240 let alone one of any engine components.
the 84 parts book only has 1 piston for cr wr and xc in 3 oversizes.
the 240 will likely be the "exact same motor" except smaller bore. one size smaller than the "250" std bore, at least thats how other years 240/250 bikes are. the only reason 240 bikes exist was to get around a rule concerning 250 class engines, so i was told here. not like its a different model or something.the 88 manual lists one piston for wr and xc as 250's with three oversizes and only one piston size for the 240. Its hard to tell what the difference is other than the bore size without having both side by side.
what does that have to do with the 87-88 250 "stroker" bikes?the 84 parts book only has 1 piston for cr wr and xc in 3 oversizes.
amazing.... why would they bother? the 240 was to ensure that even on full oversize, the engine met FIM size restrictions of 249 cc or such. I guess in competition a few cc is a psychological factor as much as the actual power difference. the American market loves its cc's
that mint 250 will run at least 200 hours on 40:1 klotz super techniplatea 400 in a 87/88 WR 250 frame, who would do that lol
I am saving my mint 250 low hour stock bore for some day...
View attachment 70774
that mint 250 will run at least 200 hours on 40:1 klotz super techniplate
thats not the case with me! im just afraid of piston fatigue with so many hours, i want to refresh the top end before something happens.. i have other huskies as well so i just pulled the motor till i get around to it. i love how the 87-88 250 bikes run.Holy longevity! Makes sense though, I have a 1997 Husqvarna 272XP chain saw that I'm sure has never been rebuilt and has likely more than 200 hours on it and it still runs flawlessly. My uncle rebuilds his saws a little more often but he makes his living with two Huskys on his sugar farm and works the hell outta his saws.
I'm really hoping I get this piston to work out, seems like if you have this bike you don't use it because of the piston dilemma and thats just not right. I'll mock up the top end before I machine the piston. I'd like to compare the original piston to the new one over the length of its travel as viewed though the ports.
run it in plenty before really working it and it will last longer. quality equipment. I give 3 full tanks of light running and lots of hot cold cycling working up to the power and shifting up gradually holding it on longer and longer letting it work in. u can usually feel its happy spot in the rev range slowly increase as it gets worn in. enjoy two fitties are nice