Kartwheel68
Husqvarna
Pro Class
Power valves give more bottom end but they take away more from the top end to put it on the bottom.
What? That is absolutely not true at all.
As you all know, Coffee (Dean) passed away a couple of years ago. I am Dean's ex-wife's husband and happen to have spent my career in tech. Over the years, I occasionally helped Dean with various tech issues.
When he passed, I worked with his kids to gather the necessary credentials to keep this site running. Since then (and for however long they worked with Coffee), Woodschick and Dirtdame have been maintaining the site and covering the costs. Without their hard work and financial support, CafeHusky would have been lost.
Over the past couple of weeks, I’ve been working to migrate the site to a free cloud compute instance so that Woodschick and Dirtdame no longer have to fund it. At the same time, I’ve updated the site to a current version of XenForo (the discussion software it runs on). The previous version was outdated and no longer supported.
Unfortunately, the new software version doesn’t support importing the old site’s styles, so for now, you’ll see the XenForo default style. This may change over time.
Coffee didn’t document the work he did on the site, so I’ve been digging through the old setup to understand how everything was running. There may still be things I’ve missed. One known issue is that email functionality is not yet working on the new site, but I hope to resolve this over time.
Thanks for your patience and support!
Power valves give more bottom end but they take away more from the top end to put it on the bottom.
What? That is absolutely not true at all.
the sound levels you speak of are very noticeable..power valve bikes are very quiet until the valve opens!I was able to resist replying to that one.
My take is with the power valves in Husqvarna motorcycles one gets better low rpm power and a lot less noise while down there. My 2004 WR250 says 42 sae hp on the certificate of origin, what do you think was on the certificate of origin for what this thread title is?
I believe Bill's statement is true if one is to take the balls out of the power valve governor.
more nonsense..Power valves give more bottom end but they take away more from the top end to put it on the bottom.
I was able to resist replying to that one.
Example please. Non power valve engine on KTM two cycle freeride as compared to any current 2cycle Husqvarna. Is not as you imply.Then how come the power valve bikes aren’t as fast top end wise as the non power valve bikes?
Then how come the power valve bikes aren’t as fast top end wise as the non power valve bikes?
yeah but not like a 390..on those the tire never stops spinning.Fast, as in miles per hour or power on the top end of the rpm range? If you are talking about top MPH that has to do with transmission and secondary drive ratios. If you are talking about top end RPM range power, power valve engines make more top RPM power. They are not the same thing.
yeah but not like a 390..on those the tire never stops spinning.
Fast, as in miles per hour or power on the top end of the rpm range? If you are talking about top MPH that has to do with transmission and secondary drive ratios. If you are talking about top end RPM range power, power valve engines make more top RPM power. They are not the same thing.
It was told to me that the power valve takes the rpm/speed from the top end and puts more power on the bottom end.
The air cooled bikes have more topend with no power valve. Maybe I was told wrong.
Doesn’t the power valve change the exhaust port timing? When it opens the exhaust port it exhausts hot gasses sooner? When it’s closed it lowers the exhaust port and gives more bottomend.