MotocycleWriter
Husqvarna
AA Class
I've got a fairly new to me TR650 and am getting it properly sorted. Someone already did a temperature sensor spoof which is working well as there are no flat spots or stalling. The bike also came with a 3D Printer airbox mod that hadn't been implemented very well so needs to be completely redone. I'm also almost 100% certain that whoever did the mod did not properly seal the box. Leaves me wondering which I want to do.
In some ways I prefer the 3D printer mod because of the accessibility to the filter and it doesn't seem as if it requires removal of the airbox. I'm handy and taking the airbox out doesn't scare me, but it does look like a full day that I could be riding (or doing other things) instead of removing the airbox. I'd also prefer to keep the throttlebody throat sealed in the airbox. This bike has one of the highest air intakes I've ever seen and I'd like to keep it there.
On the other hand, many riders seem to swear by the pod mod and believe it is the better of the two fixes. I also seem to recall seeing somewhere that it can be performed without the complete removal of the airbox (see above). The pod mod also seems to provide more surface area for filtration but I don't know how much that matters given the limiting factor of the inlet size.
Given that both of these mods have been around for a year or more I'm assuming there is probably some good, recent data as well as improvements in both mods, and improvements in performing the mods. Comments?
In some ways I prefer the 3D printer mod because of the accessibility to the filter and it doesn't seem as if it requires removal of the airbox. I'm handy and taking the airbox out doesn't scare me, but it does look like a full day that I could be riding (or doing other things) instead of removing the airbox. I'd also prefer to keep the throttlebody throat sealed in the airbox. This bike has one of the highest air intakes I've ever seen and I'd like to keep it there.
On the other hand, many riders seem to swear by the pod mod and believe it is the better of the two fixes. I also seem to recall seeing somewhere that it can be performed without the complete removal of the airbox (see above). The pod mod also seems to provide more surface area for filtration but I don't know how much that matters given the limiting factor of the inlet size.
Given that both of these mods have been around for a year or more I'm assuming there is probably some good, recent data as well as improvements in both mods, and improvements in performing the mods. Comments?