From what I have read I would say it's a KTM issue and not a SC issue. But my guess is just that.... a guess.
I haven't gone that far in checking it out, but, I read that he changed the carb out, back to the original, on the first day.
Apparently, little, to no testing was done with the APT, prior to the event. Corey, in one of his posts, postulated that perhaps the carb boot was blocking part of the pressurisation circuitry - at the top of the carb venturi, or just that it needed a different needle. He knew no more at that time. One report said that the bike lacked power with the Smart Carb, against the carb it was extensively developed with. Understandable, in a rush / rash change. Especially if part of the Smart Carbs main circuitry was being hindered, by other parts.
When looking at the bike, it looked like, with the necessary huge tank, he / mechanics may not have been able to get to the adjustment dial on the top of the Smart Carb - it could have simply been that - not being easily adjusted, for lower running.
Once again, WTF knows? I'll have to chase up more info on him/ his experiences this year
In ADVs thread, a bloke that has had some involvement with Luis' previous attempts on the / a 150, said that this year, another bloke had been used for the build up of Louis' engines - and That was the reason for the blow ups / seizures. I think the commenter, had previously been the engine builder.
So, blow ups seem to be Nothing to do with the Smart Carb, as it was removed during / after the first day. Just, rushed, inadequately tested - the Smart Carb- prior to the event.
A 150 in the Dakar - yes it sounds a bit crazy, but it's Luis' decision.
He, apparently, DID reach the finish, in last (?) place.
Bravo, Louis!
I'd love to see him make it easier on himself, and use a 300. I'm sure it would handle the event much, much easier. And, with the Smart Carb, with it's claimed improved economy / power / fuelling / oiling, would really help keep tank capacity required, down. Unbeknownst to many, a 2t in Rallies', does not necessarily mean having to have a huge tank, in comparison to a 4t. The lighter weight of the bike, and the comparatively much better torque and HP, and Lower revs, means they don't use as much fuel as you'd think. I worked at the OZ Maico distributors, a couple of times, many years ago and, and Ross, communicating with Herbert Scheck (sp? - I often get the great man's name spelling wrong, sorry), when he rode the 490 /500 Maico in support of his daughter in the Dakar, Herbert said they'd seriously over estimated the size of the tank required. They could have used much smaller capacity tanks.