Kyle Tarry
Husqvarna
Pro Class
That one actually doesn't look too terrible! I would think that bike would feel decent, although probably pretty soft on bigger hits.
With 1.4mm of float, that midvalve isn't doing that much. If you think about the flow area, with that much lift the area around the base of the shim is about the same as the port area. You'll still get some damping out of it, but it's probably about the same damping as you'd get with no shims on there at all (except that rebound would be awful in that case). Which, I might add, I think is actually significant; the midvalve in a fork can move pretty fast, and has to pass a lot of fluid, so even without shims blocking the path you still get nontrivial damping forces out of it.
The reality is, enduro midvalves are quite a bit like orifice damping. They snap through the float pretty easy, bend back a bit, and then they can't open any more, and you get real progressive damping out of them.
Try something like this on the mid:
23.1 (3X)
20.1
18.1
16.1
14.1
12.1
10.?
Backer (18-20mm dia)
Float 0.7mm ish
With 1.4mm of float, that midvalve isn't doing that much. If you think about the flow area, with that much lift the area around the base of the shim is about the same as the port area. You'll still get some damping out of it, but it's probably about the same damping as you'd get with no shims on there at all (except that rebound would be awful in that case). Which, I might add, I think is actually significant; the midvalve in a fork can move pretty fast, and has to pass a lot of fluid, so even without shims blocking the path you still get nontrivial damping forces out of it.
The reality is, enduro midvalves are quite a bit like orifice damping. They snap through the float pretty easy, bend back a bit, and then they can't open any more, and you get real progressive damping out of them.
Try something like this on the mid:
23.1 (3X)
20.1
18.1
16.1
14.1
12.1
10.?
Backer (18-20mm dia)
Float 0.7mm ish