krieg
Husqvarna
Pro Class
Do a top end replacement on both. Then write back. And, as for power, see my FIRST post in this thread which basically says exactly what you say. The power is similar for sure... until you get to WOT. I stand by my drag race statement and would gladly back it up with a drag race or two or three for anyone who would like to meet at Carolina Adventure World drag track with their "manly" 150 SX's. My whole purpose for prolonging this stupid discussion was to point out the absurd, name-dropping, claims of another poster who felt it necessary to one-up me with words like "vet expert buddies" and "a very fast 40+ expert who finished top 10 at Lorettas a couple of years ago".... Big fuc&in' whoop. I have real-world track experience on both bikes (pre-2012), and the results are obvious. Oh, and then there's the small detail about the woods versions on the dyno... But hey... WTF? Who am I to claim any expertise on the "vet experts who say wow". I'm just an average grass roots MX Dad with years of experience racing both bikes at unsanctioned and sanctioned tracks.... with too many plaques to fit on my son's wall... largely due to Husqvarna 150's. My 150 KTM's were both wonderful.... till they exploded... both mid season.Power is very similar for sure. Each person's story will differ, as whoever's bike they've ridden has different jetting, PV setting, etc., than all the others ridden by other folks. To say there's much output difference between either bike tuned right is just wrong.
How is a KTM harder to work on? I'm on a Husky now, and think my KTM was easier to wrench if simply because the PV is much easier to get to....
I prefer the Husky because it's different, not better or worse.....
But hey... again... WTF do I know?