water racer
Husqvarna
Pro Class
I was referring to the many that were calling for Husky to put the old engine in the TC frame until a whole new bike was ready. I am sure it would be a waste of time and money to e-start the old engine.Don't get me wrong, but I love the idea of the big bore 2T in the new frame. My WR360 has the 6 speed and while it works well it would probably be a better fit for the true WR 5 speed that husky installed in the 1999-2001 WR250. I tried to make that swap but the extra size of the 360 crankcase doesn't allow room for the much larger 5th gear. The abundant torque and spread of power in a big bore 2T makes the wide 5 work well. I also think that e-start is an un-needed option in a pure race bike. Problem is that most of these will be going to sometime racers and frequent trail riders where the e-start is really a plus. When you are having to get off and kick with your left leg on really steep side hills while the pack of ktms hit the button and are gone really sucks for a short guy. Obviously talent is an issue.
If the new 2T is just a one year retro-fit to bridge to an all new 2T line in 2014 or 2015 then I get back to where they aren't going to take sales away from KTM, et al. They need to at least offer the options that KTM offers. KTM's e-start is an afterthought design but mostly works and Husky could add the same type of design if only as an option. JMO on selling the brand.
GP