As you all know, Coffee (Dean) passed away a couple of years ago. I am Dean's ex-wife's husband and happen to have spent my career in tech. Over the years, I occasionally helped Dean with various tech issues.
When he passed, I worked with his kids to gather the necessary credentials to keep this site running. Since then (and for however long they worked with Coffee), Woodschick and Dirtdame have been maintaining the site and covering the costs. Without their hard work and financial support, CafeHusky would have been lost.
Over the past couple of weeks, I’ve been working to migrate the site to a free cloud compute instance so that Woodschick and Dirtdame no longer have to fund it. At the same time, I’ve updated the site to a current version of XenForo (the discussion software it runs on). The previous version was outdated and no longer supported.
Unfortunately, the new software version doesn’t support importing the old site’s styles, so for now, you’ll see the XenForo default style. This may change over time.
Coffee didn’t document the work he did on the site, so I’ve been digging through the old setup to understand how everything was running. There may still be things I’ve missed. One known issue is that email functionality is not yet working on the new site, but I hope to resolve this over time.
Thanks for your patience and support!
I often wondered why they never used a cable adjustable operated power valve? Rather than take power from the engine.
Last version of the Honda CR250 used this.Sherco n TM use electric servo/cable Pvs.
yup troy is most certainly correct...the swedes had it on the 87 husky cr250...right before the italians scrapped all the swede 2 stroke designs..i understand why they did it but they were about to evolve with a new case design.Electronic powervalves have been around for years but not on dirtbikes. Yamaha YPVS on the RD/RZ, Kwaka KIPS on the KR's, Honda RC Valve on the NSR's..2t's with electronic servo's or something...that's was almost 40+ years ago and l can't believe that modern day manufacturers couldn't build a PV that somehow can work of the rotation of the alternator or even a simple rpm sensor to the countershaft.
I know 2t and majority of dirt guys hate more electronics but (showing my age), 40years ago electronic PV's were in place and we're still yet to see it on the dirt????
Too bad Gustavsson and the boys weren't interested in developing the Swedish 2T bikes too, when they started Husaberg....yup troy is most certainly correct...the swedes had it on the 87 husky cr250...right before the italians scrapped all the swede 2 stroke designs..i understand why they did it but they were about to evolve with a new case design.
im betting they could only go with one or the other, and there was more promise to the thumper tech that was mostly unavailable to anyone else at the time.Too bad Gustavsson and the boys weren't interested in developing the Swedish 2T bikes too, when they started Husaberg....
Funny that this conversation would come up. I was at a 2 day 200 mile woods ride this weekend and a bunch of guys were sitting around the campfire wishing for a big bore air cooled engine with a modern transmission in a modern chassis. Simplicity and light weight with a narrow tank and no chance of smashing radiators. Some modern spark curve mapping and carb.... they might be on to something. Of the 200 mile course 70% was bar width single track and it poured rain for the first half of the first day so linear power with good traction was better than tons of horsepower. There was a lot of vintage bikes and "vintage riders"and the median age was probably 45 years old, so most guys had let go of their expectations of winning a GNCC.