Either would work. I would like to see a solid or welded transfer gear and a more forgiving clutch than another transfer gear/torque limiter.
I think if your design is similar to how I describe allowing 360 degrees of slip then mechanical lockup, then slip again. "ratcheting" type. It would cure our problems because the limiter would be no longer able to slip full rotations which will heat and "anneal" the plates as you have described previously. Thus the amount of slip would be MECHANICALLY limited. Vs friction. This is what we need. Also how many people have broken gears? On ANY bike?
Can we get a picture of the gears in the 449/511 vs the gears in a crf450r or comparable bike? Maybe older husky 450/510's?
I still think the clutch idea is onto something. Solid transfer gear, a more forgiving clutch = win win. Also back torque limiting (slipper) which is something most of the supermoto guys pay 1000$ for all the time.
I think if your design is similar to how I describe allowing 360 degrees of slip then mechanical lockup, then slip again. "ratcheting" type. It would cure our problems because the limiter would be no longer able to slip full rotations which will heat and "anneal" the plates as you have described previously. Thus the amount of slip would be MECHANICALLY limited. Vs friction. This is what we need. Also how many people have broken gears? On ANY bike?
Can we get a picture of the gears in the 449/511 vs the gears in a crf450r or comparable bike? Maybe older husky 450/510's?
I still think the clutch idea is onto something. Solid transfer gear, a more forgiving clutch = win win. Also back torque limiting (slipper) which is something most of the supermoto guys pay 1000$ for all the time.