Tetley
Husqvarna
AA Class
Last weekend my 2016 TE 300 died in relatively shallow water again, it was only about 18" deep, and the bike conked out within about 3 seconds. I used to think this was caused by water getting up the vent tubes into the float bowl, but on closer inspection, I discovered the infamous gap between the airbox and subframe. The gap is where the side stand rubber strap is mounted, and is around 30mm X 2mm. When I got home,I aimed a hose at the gap, and then checked the air filter, and it was soaked.
What is the best and most successful way of sealing this up? I'm guessing silicone sealant, but has anyone fitted any brackets, or self tapping screws to try and keep these 2 parts together, and stop them moving and breaking the silicone joint?
The second point is the pros and cons of routing the upper carb vents into the airbox. I think the theory of running all 5 vents together and down wards (as the bike is delivered), is no water can get up them as the float bowl becomes a sealed system, where the air is trapped above the fuel. So presumably, the deeper the water, the higher the air pressure acting on the fuel, so the richer the mixture. Also when under pressure, no fresh fuel can enter the float valve.
Running the upper vents into the airbox then releases the pressure, so fresh fuel can enter, but presumably then allows water into the float bowl if the carb dips under water?
The way I see it, is the vents pointing down allows for shorter very deep water crossings, and venting the top vents to the airbox allows for medium depth very long water crossings. As my bike will last for around 1/4 mile or more on a float bowl of fuel, I can't see that running out of fuel will ever be an issue.
I have also heard of terminating all the vents into a 35mm film canister, anyone know anything about this?
Discuss.....!
What is the best and most successful way of sealing this up? I'm guessing silicone sealant, but has anyone fitted any brackets, or self tapping screws to try and keep these 2 parts together, and stop them moving and breaking the silicone joint?
The second point is the pros and cons of routing the upper carb vents into the airbox. I think the theory of running all 5 vents together and down wards (as the bike is delivered), is no water can get up them as the float bowl becomes a sealed system, where the air is trapped above the fuel. So presumably, the deeper the water, the higher the air pressure acting on the fuel, so the richer the mixture. Also when under pressure, no fresh fuel can enter the float valve.
Running the upper vents into the airbox then releases the pressure, so fresh fuel can enter, but presumably then allows water into the float bowl if the carb dips under water?
The way I see it, is the vents pointing down allows for shorter very deep water crossings, and venting the top vents to the airbox allows for medium depth very long water crossings. As my bike will last for around 1/4 mile or more on a float bowl of fuel, I can't see that running out of fuel will ever be an issue.
I have also heard of terminating all the vents into a 35mm film canister, anyone know anything about this?
Discuss.....!