As you all know, Coffee (Dean) passed away a couple of years ago. I am Dean's ex-wife's husband and happen to have spent my career in tech. Over the years, I occasionally helped Dean with various tech issues.
When he passed, I worked with his kids to gather the necessary credentials to keep this site running. Since then (and for however long they worked with Coffee), Woodschick and Dirtdame have been maintaining the site and covering the costs. Without their hard work and financial support, CafeHusky would have been lost.
Over the past couple of weeks, I’ve been working to migrate the site to a free cloud compute instance so that Woodschick and Dirtdame no longer have to fund it. At the same time, I’ve updated the site to a current version of XenForo (the discussion software it runs on). The previous version was outdated and no longer supported.
Unfortunately, the new software version doesn’t support importing the old site’s styles, so for now, you’ll see the XenForo default style. This may change over time.
Coffee didn’t document the work he did on the site, so I’ve been digging through the old setup to understand how everything was running. There may still be things I’ve missed. One known issue is that email functionality is not yet working on the new site, but I hope to resolve this over time.
Thanks for your patience and support!
Yes I had the same experience with SEM stators when I raced a 89 TC regularly in the early nineties, three failures I think. May just go the electrex route when I complete the current rebuilds. Did you need a different coil unit to go with the electrex ?After about 6 sem stators I tried an electrex stator in my husaberg and it works great. I currently have an sem that is miraculously still working in my 1984 510View attachment 36612
Hey Daftmate. Thank you for the post and pictures. Very helpful.
I can see now that your 89's are inboard stators and your flywheel rotates counter clockwise.
My 1986 510 has a flywheel rotating clockwise and an outboard stator.
After hooking up the wires in various configurations I got a pretty decent spark off the plug.
The carb rubber manifold attaching to the engine has disintegrated and I need to purchase another one.
Does anyone know of a place where I can get a rubber manifold for a 1986 510 with a PHM40 Dellorto?
I noticed the later water cooled 610tc was using a PHM40. Do any other years or models have the same manifold boot?
Cheers,
Good debate this ! Yes the amount of advance is proportional to engine revs but think about the direction in which the electonics will apply the advance. Isn't this different in inverted and non-inverted systems? I still can't see why the direction wouldn't flip if the same stator was placed a different way round relative to the crank/flywheel. Spent a few beers debating this late night at my local and we couldn't agree either so pls. understand if my logic is still in the bottom of the glass.Daftmate, advance is a function of engine revs, not direction of rotation. The advance is controlled by the CDI and should work fine. However you are correct that you can not use an inverted stator on a normal flywheel arrangement. Direction of rotation is important for SEM stators.
Are you trying to start it with no air filter? Makes them very lean and hard to start cold.
I'm still refining my technique on the XT500...
What year? I have an older TT500 and it is super ES to start. Roll it over TDC with the manual comp release and one nice kick and shes lit.
![]()
Yes I had the same experience with SEM stators when I raced a 89 TC regularly in the early nineties, three failures I think. May just go the electrex route when I complete the current rebuilds. Did you need a different coil unit to go with the electrex ?
wow, really old thread to dig up..might have been easier to just start a new one asking this questionI have a 1987 TE 510 with the external mounted stator ... Could anyone please tell me what stator i will need ? Part # ect ... I seen where the external stator & internal stator will NOT work in both applications . as 1 has winding that go clockwise & the other has winding that counterclockwise .. or something to this nature . Is there any truth to this ? Thanks for any & all help
I will start a new threadwow, really old thread to dig up..might have been easier to just start a new one asking this question