2013 TE310 - 37.4
2013 TE449 - 37.4
2007 KTM 525exc - 36.4
2003 Husky TE610e - 35.6
Most women are shorter than men. So it's even more difficult for them to get into off road riding than it is for me, a 5'11" tall man with a 29" inseam.
I know that there are people with longer legs. Or that are 6'100. That's fine. I just want a wider range of seat heights. One height does not fit all any more than one spring weight suits all or one size of jeans fit all.
Anyways, I'm derailing the thread, it's just a subject that annoys me quite a bit.
Husky made a TE250 low version for just that reason and after hearing this over and over and no one bought it.
![excuseme :excuseme: :excuseme:](/smilies/excuseme.gif)
http://www.motorcycle.com/manufacturer/2012-husqvarna-te250-review-91322.html
Compared to the mechanically similar TE310, the TE250 built for the U.S. market has a seat height two inches lower (35.5 inches) to better accommodate street/commuter riders.
so IMHO they did not "They just limited their customer base a little more." they actually listed to customers and responded. On top of all this if a short guy or women wants a high performance bike they need to buy one and get it lowered. There is just not a big enough market to support this need and most fast women want a modified race bike not a play bike so have no issues with lowering them if need be. If you don't need a high performance low bike there are gobs of options.