nev..
Terrarist
I don't have any experience with these how much difference is there between the "trick the computer" chip and the PC that essentially replaces it?
I won't claim to be the expert in these matters, but from my understanding, the booster plug and the other plug just influence to enhance the behaviour of the bike using the factory EFI map by lying about the ambient temperature, while the Power commander will completely remap the EFI without any regard for the stock factory map.
The understanding I have, is that bikes ship to different markets with slightly different factory maps, which might be tweaked a bit to get around local regulations. For example if a bike with the factory exhaust is too loud to get by a particular countries regulations, but the manufacturers know that the country will test for noise at a particular RPM range, at a particular distance, then the factory might ship to that country with a map which has a flat spot at or below the specified RPM range so that things don't get too noisy until higher up in the range. I believe this is the same for emissions, where EFI maps are designed to meet the local regulation, rather than produce the best outcome for the rider. It is in these instances that the Power commander will give the user a much better outcome because it will remove any flat spots in the graph without consideration for noise or emissions. The power commander will also deal much better with engine or exhaust modifications.
If you're a bike modifier, or you really want to stretch the performance of the bike right out to the extremes, then the PC might be for you, but if you feel it isn't running quite right for you, and just needs a bit of a push in the right direction, then you'd probably get the result you want with one of the booster plug alternatives.